M.L. Raves1, J.F. Doreleijers1, H. Vis1, C.E. Vorgias2, Z. Dauter3, K.S. Wilson4 and R. Kaptein1
1 Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 2 EMBL, Hamburg, Germany, 3 Brookhaven National Lab., USA, 4 Protein Structure Group, York University, UK.
Joint refinement, i.e. the simultaneous refinement of a structure agains
NMR and X-ray data [1], was done in order to investigate the compatibility of
the two data sets. Wherever a conflict was found, attempts have been made to
determine whether it arose from misinterpretation of the experimental data or
from real differences of the protein conformation in solution vs. that
in the crystal.
The DNA-binding protein HU was taken as a test-case. Its structure consists of
a rigid core and two flexible `arms' and was solved independently by NMR [2]
and by X-ray crystallogaphy [3]. The joint refinement procedure started with an
unbiased random structure, which was folded using the NMR restraints and then
placed in the crystallographic unit cell by molecular replacement. Important
differences in main-chain conformations and secondary structure were identified
and investigated.
[1] B. Shaanan et al. (1992) Science 257, 961-964
[2] H. Vis et al. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 254, 692-703
[3] Z. Dauter and K.S. Wilson, manuscript in preparation